Up to 18 hours Apple TV app movie playbackīuilt-in 49.9-watt-hour lithium-polymer battery Of course, hard core gamers will likely demand a Mac Pro with an advanced GPU to go even faster.įor Pro App test results, see our page featuring Final Cut Pro X, DaVinci Resolve, OctaneRender, etc.13.3-inch (diagonal) LED-backlit display with IPS technology 2560-by-1600 native resolution at 227 pixels per inch with support for millions of colorsĨ-core CPU with 4 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores Even at the native 2560x1440 of the 27" screen it can smoke them. The iMac is obviously superior to both laptops for gaming.
(You can insure that by disabling "Automatic Graphics Switching" in the System Preferences > Energy Saver tile.) By running the apps above in both GPU modes, we are able to inform those of you wondering if you should buy the model with Iris Pro only or the one with the GeForce GT 750M in addition to the Iris Pro. For best performance, you want to run games with the GeForce GT 750M enabled in the 2013 model. Notice we used gfxCardStatus to force the Iris Pro integrated GPU to run the same set of games.
Though the 2013 rMBP with GeForce GT 750M is only slightly faster than the 2012 rMBP with GeForce GT 650M, both models produce acceptable framerates for gaming at high quality settings and up to 1920x1200 resolution. (LARGER number means FASTER in FRAMES per SECOND) Valley OpenGL Benchmark - Extreme Preset (1600x900). Heaven OpenGL Benchmark - Extreme Preset (1600x900). X-Plane 10 - TimeDemo of the flight of F4F Phantom Jet in lightning storm. (LARGER number means FASTER in FRAMES per SECOND)Ĭivilization V (Steam) - The built-in "-LeaderBenchmark" was used at 1920x1200 since it is GPU intensive. Left 4 Dead 2 (Steam) - TimeDemo of a recorded game session.
( * gfxCardStatus was used to disable Dynamic Switching and force either the Intel Iris Pro or the GeForce GT 750 to run each app.) All three were running OS X 10.9 Mavericksĭiablo III - Re-killing the Undead on the way to the village.
Force click for mac pro retina 2013 plus#
How fast is the 2013 Retina MacBook Pro compared to the 'best' early 2012 Retina MacBook Pro? And how do both compare to the 'best' 2013 iMac? We have a sampling of games plus Heaven and Valley results.Ģ013 iMac = 2013 iMac (27") with 3.5GHz Core-i7, 32GB of 1600MHz DDR3, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M GPU (4G), and 512GB PCIe flash storageĢ013 rMBP 750M = 2013 Retina MacBook Pro (15") with 2.6GHz Quad-Core i7, 16GB of 1600MHz DDR3, NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M GPU (2G) *, and 512GB PCIe flash storage.Ģ013 rMBP IrisPro = 2013 Retina MacBook Pro (15") 2.6GHz Quad-Core i7, 16GB of 1600MHz DDR3, Iris Pro Integerated GPU (1G) *, and 512GB PCIe flash storage.Ģ012 rMBP = 'early 2012' Retina MacBook Pro (15") with 2.7GHz Quad-Core i7, 16GB of 1600MHz DDR3, NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M GPU (1G), and 512GB 6Gbps SATA flash storage November 7th, 2013 - added results for Iris Pro forced to do the GPU work Posted Saturday, November 2nd, 2013 by rob-ART morgan, mad scientist
0 kommentar(er)
